A three-judge panel, led by Fourth Circuit Judge Robert King, held that the state had shown that the law “is reasonably adapted” to its “significant interests in protecting public safety and preventing crime.” The Court went on to state that the law was “inappropriately condemned by the district court for being a ‘rationing system.’” Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler praised the ruling, stating that Maryland is a safer place because of the law. The Second Amendment Foundation vowed to appeal the ruling. The organization could either ask for an en banc hearing, where the full Fourth Circuit would hear the case, or petition the U.S. Supreme Court for cert.

This all started in 2009, when Woollard heard a tapping on the window of his Baltimore County farmhouse. It was the sound of an intruder breaking into his family home. Woollard ran to his bedroom and grabbed a Remington twelve-gauge shotgun. Woollard and his adult son were able to take down the would-be burglar, after an intense struggle. They held the 6’2, 155-pound man at gun point until the police arrived over two hours later.

For the first time in his life, Woollard had become a victim of violent crime. This led him to apply for a license to carry a concealed handgun in public. To his surprise, Maryland State Police denied his request. According to Woollard, state officials cited a lack of danger to his life as a factor in denying the permit.

In 2012, state police denied 128 of the 2,500 new permit applications and 2,980 renewals on this basis. State police found that those applicants did not have a substantial reason to wear, carry or transport a gun outside the home. According to state officials, there are currently about 14,000 active concealed-carry permits throughout Maryland.

Woollard filed a federal lawsuit on July 29, 2012, becoming the first person to challenge the state’s new handgun law. The challenge came in the wake of two recent Supreme Court decisions striking down laws restricting the ability to carry handguns.

In an opinion filed March 5, U.S. District Judge Benson E. Legg ruled in favor of Woollard, finding the Maryland law in violation of the Second Amendment. The state of Maryland sought a delay of the order and later appealed the ruling. The appeals court allowed the law to stand while the state prepared its challenge. Maryland State Police vowed to continue enforcing the old rules until courts came to a definitive decision on the proper course of action.

The post Federal appeals court upholds Maryland’s concealed carry law appeared first on .

Maryland’s bill would allow a small number of academic research centers to distribute marijuana through nurses and doctors. The bill would create a commission to decide which research centers could participate and would regulate those that decided to sign up for the program. Qualified centers would be required to list the medical conditions they would treat and the criteria under which they would allow patients to participate.

The academic research centers also would be required to monitor those patients and publish related findings. It is unclear whether any of the eligible centers are interested in participating in the program. Two the state’s largest institutions, University of Maryland Medical System and Johns Hopkins University, have indicated that they are uninterested in joining the program, at least for the time being. Del. Dan K. Morhaim (D-Baltimore County), the primary sponsor of the House bill, said that he is confident qualified academic center will come forward if the bill becomes law.

Medical marijuana supporters have been working at the committee level for three years to get the bill passed. Numerous bills have been drafted during that time, but this is the first with a real shot at becoming law. This bill was boosted in part by an endorsement from the state’s health secretary. The bill was also received much needed help from Gov. Martin O’Malley (D), who dropped his opposition and supported the proposal. Officials in Gov. O’Malley’s administration described the potential program as cautious enough to their support.

It’s estimated that patients could not participate in the proposed program before fiscal year 2016. Proponents of the bill believe that it has serious life saving potential. Del. Cheryl Glenn, who voted in favor of the bill, believes that medical marijuana can help those who experience loss of appetite as a result of grave illnesses, like cancer. She also believes that it could be used to alleviate severe pain and suffering. Advocates argue that the bill would create a safe, legal, and reliable way for patients to obtain the drug. Dan Riffle, deputy director of government relations for the Marijuana Policy Project, said that cancer patients shouldn’t be forced into an illicit marketplace to obtain a drug recommended by doctors. Even with passage of the bill, it remains unclear how many center will open and when.

The House has yet to vote on the Senate’s bill, which would make possession of small amounts of marijuana, 10 grams or less, a civil offense with a fine. A third marijuana bill would legalize the drug outright. That bill would create a system to regulate and tax the drug like alcohol. It has yet to come before a vote in committee.

The post Maryland House Approves Medical Marijuana Bill appeared first on .

Earlier this spring and summer, the Prince George’s County Police Department, Narcotics and Vice Division, planned and carried out an elaborate sting operation to arrest and charge gentlemen who solicited sexual services of undercover female officers. Over a hundred males were arrested and charged with soliciting prostitution. You can find more information about one example of this type of sting here.

In past stings of this type, ads were placed in Craigslist, but now that Craigslist no longer allows posting “adult” ads, the activity has migrated to Backpage, a similar site. The postings usually have a catchy title such as “Lunch Special,” or “afternoon Delight.” They include provocative pictures of a young woman’s body, rates and a phone number to call. The police secure two adjoining rooms in a local hotel. About ten officers participate in every operation: Two young females posing as prostitutes, a couple of undercover officers outside the room, about four hiding in the bathroom and closets waiting for a signal from the female officer to jump the suspect and arrest him and a few officers in the adjoining room, taking arrestee information and keeping them secured until they are transported to the police station at the end of the day.

When a “John” calls the posted number, the undercover female officer engages in a brief sexual conversation with them, and provides the address to the hotel where. The hopeful client is told to call again when he arrives at the hotel in order to get a room number. In reality it is to avoid two men from coming up at the same time and to allow all the officers to be in position to arrest.

The gentleman then goes up to the room and knocks. Some men report that they are tackled and arrested as soon as they enter the room. Others engage in conversation with the female undercover officer, confirming the agreement from the phone conversation. Still other men put money on a table as payment, grab some condoms or start undressing. At some point, the female officer gives the signal and the man is physically overpowered and handcuffed by the officers charging from the bathroom and closet.

It is now the policy of the State’s Attorney’s Office in prince George’s County not to allow any plea bargaining on solicitation for prostitution cases that will allow Defendants to plea to an amended charge. The goal is to send a strong message that prostitution is not tolerated in the County. Other counties allow diversion programs for first time offenders, such as a class or community service hours, but this is not longer the case in Prince George’s.

These cases are triable and winnable. There are issues with the voice identification by the police officer, also with the confirmation of the agreement that must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Defendant knowingly solicited sexual services. The fact that about twenty men are arrested on any given sting opens the door for mistakes in the charging documents that may also help win the case. However, only a skilled prostitution lawyer can win a case like this, there is no way a pro se Defendant can win at trial.

The post Common Defenses Against Prostitution Stings appeared first on .

In 1979, six-year-old Etan Patz vanished after he left his Manhattan home one morning to go to the school bus stop. Police officers investigated several leads and tips they received about Etan’s case, but they never found sufficient evidence regarding who could have kidnapped the boy. Police spent thousands of hours investigating the case and interviewed hundreds of people since Etan’s disappearance 33 years ago. For years, Etan’s parents hoped that he was still alive and never changed their phone number just in case Etan tried to contact them.

In 1982, police spoke with a person of interest named Juan Antonio Ramos. It was reported that Ramos tried to kidnap two young boys. Police found pictures of boys when they searched Ramos’s home, but they didn’t find any evidence linking Ramos to Etan’s disappearance.

Police decided to question Ramos again in 1988 while he was serving time in prison for a molestation conviction. Ramos admitted that he took a boy who could have been Etan to his apartment to have sex with him. The boy declined his sexual advances and left. The police were still not able to find enough evidence to pursue criminal charges against Ramos.

In 2001, Stan Patz had his son declared legally dead and initiated a wrongful death lawsuit against Ramos. The standard for determining liability in a civil suit is less stringent than that for a criminal case. The Patz family presented enough evidence in the civil suit to get the court to rule that Ramos was liable for Etan’s death.

In May 2012, a 51-year-old New Jersey man named Pedro Hernandez confessed to killing Etan Patz. The police started focusing on Hernandez after one of his relatives called them. The relative informed the police that Hernandez talked about doing something bad to a boy in New York City which was confirmed by a Rochester DWI Attorney. In 1979, Hernandez was 18-years-old and worked as a stock clerk at a small convenience store in the same neighborhood where Etan lived. Etan headed to the store to buy a soda before going to the bus stop.

When Hernandez talked to police officers, he told them he choked Etan in the store’s basement. Then he stored the body in a freezer and later threw the body in the trash. Hernandez also retraced his steps at the location where the murder occurred. Police officers were never able to recover Etan’s body. They also searched Hernandez’s home and didn’t retrieve any tangible evidence connecting him to the 33 year-old crime.

Hernandez’s lawyer stated that Hernandez has serious psychological problems. Hernandez suffers from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Hernandez’s mental health has raised questions regarding the credibility of his confession. Hernandez’s lawyer plans on arguing that the previous confession was false and that Hernandez’s mental illness could have led him to mistakenly believe that he committed the murder. During the next court appearance on December 12, 2012, Hernandez will enter a not guilty plea.

The post Suspect in 1979 Murder of Etan Patz is Indicted, Will Plead Not Guilty appeared first on .

On December 16, 2012, Randall White was waiting on line in Little Caesars for his pizza when he was informed by the staff that it would take a few more minutes to complete his order. As White started to complain about the slow service, another customer named Michael Jock told him to stop whining, according to the Tampa Bay Times. Jock pulled out a revolver after White shoved him and lifted his fist. As they fought, Jock fired two shots into White’s torso. One bullet went into the wall of the restaurant. Two other customers along with the staff occupied the pizzeria at the time.

According to Florida’s self-defense statute, a person is justified in using non-deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that it is necessary in order to defend against another individual’s imminent use of unlawful force. A person is justified in using deadly force if it is used to prevent imminent death or bodily harm or if it prevents the imminent commission of a forcible felony.

The person’s response must be proportionate to the severity of the potential threat to avoid criminal prosecution. Jock may have a difficult time proving that shooting White was proportionate to the physical threat imposed when White raised his fist.

When the police arrived, Jock informed the police that he feared for his life and shooting White was an act of self-defense. The police did not believe the incident escalated to the point where Jock was justified in using deadly force. The police officers arrested Jock and charged him with aggravated battery with a weapon. He was also charged with shooting within a building. Jock was released from jail after posting $20,000 bail. Jock will have another chance to argue self-defense when his case is presented to the court.

White received medical treatment for the gunshot wounds. White told the Tampa Bay Times that he pushed Jock during the altercation, but Jock’s life was not threatened.

Florida’s stand your ground laws have been the subject of much debate this past year because of the Trayvon Martin case. In that criminal case, George Zimmerman fatally shot 17-year-old Travyon Martin in the chest at close range after Zimmerman spotted Martin walking in a gated community. Zimmerman said he had a violent encounter with Martin that led to the shooting. Zimmerman claimed self-defense, but was charged with second degree murder. The trial is scheduled to start in June 2013.

The self-defense law was also recently cited in another pending criminal case in which a Florida resident named Michael Dunn fatally shot an unarmed teenager during a confrontation. In November 2012, Dunn was at a gas station when he asked a car full of teenagers to turn their music down. After Dunn and the teenagers exchanged words, Dunn fired multiple shots at the vehicle and killed 17-year-old Jordan Davis. Dunn was charged with murder and attempted murder. Dunn stated that he acted in self-defense.

If you have been charged with a violent offense, you need to speak with a Maryland criminal defense lawyer. Schedule a consultation so that your case can be evaluated. A skilled Maryland criminal defense lawyer will protect your rights and fight aggressively to help you reach the best possible outcome in the case.

The post Man Uses “Stand Your Ground” Law as Justification for Shooting Fellow Patron in Pizzeria appeared first on .

In 2009, James Washington suffered a heart attack while serving time in prison for another unrelated crime. Washington believed he was going to die from the heart attack. When Washington was being transported to the hospital, he told one of the prison guards that he beat a woman to death. The prison guard informed police authorities about Washington’s confession.

In 1995, Nashville police investigated the murder of a woman named Joyce Goodener. Washington stabbed Goodener in the neck, bludgeoned her to death with a cinder block and set her body on fire. The police found Goodener’s body in an empty house.

Nashville police knew that Washington met with Goodener on the day of her murder. Washington was considered a “person of interest” in the case, but the police didn’t have enough evidence to press criminal charges against him. Since there were no other likely suspects, the murder remained unsolved for years.

Washington was never tried or punished for the crime and was seeking forgiveness when he made the confession. If Washington didn’t die, he assumed he was still safe from prosecution based on the mistaken belief that a statute of limitations applied to the case. He thought the statute of limitations ran out and it would prevent the government from pursuing a criminal case against him. In Tennessee as well as in other states, a statute of limitations isn’t usually applicable to serious criminal offenses such as murder.

After Washington made a full recovery from the heart attack, he tried to take back the confession. But it was too late. The confession was what law enforcement needed to reopen the Joyce Goodener’s murder case. Washington will now serve a life sentence after being convicted for Goodener’s murder. There is no indication that Washington ever spoke of the murder prior to his deathbed confession. If Washington didn’t make the confession to the prison guard, he could have served his time for the other crime and then been released from prison. But now he is serving a life sentence.

The value of speaking with a criminal defense attorney should never be underestimated. One of the most important rights a person has is the right to protect oneself against self-incrimination. This means that you should not reveal any information about a criminal case without your attorney present. Many people misinterpret laws or assume things will work in their favor and operate under the assumption that it will prevent them from being charged or convicted of a crime. Whenever you are facing the possibility of being charged with a crime, the stakes are too high to make decisions on your own without an experienced criminal defense attorney on your side.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense, you need to speak with a Maryland criminal defense lawyer. Schedule a consultation to discuss your case. An experienced Maryland criminal defense lawyer will explain your rights and work diligently to fight the charges against you.

The post Tennessee Man on Deathbed Confesses to Murder, Then Recovers and Gets Life Sentence appeared first on .

Song will be under supervised probation for up to three years, with a 9 pm curfew. By entering a plea of guilty to a charge that carries 3 years in jail, Song will now be unable to ever purchase or carry a firearm.

This is a type of charge and case that we might not have seen even five years ago. The explosion of social media and the various ways in which we communicate with each other are ripe for this type off anonymous thuggery. As far as we know, Song had no intention to carry out any of the acts that he was threatening, but because he put those thoughts in a place that other people could find them, he found himself in trouble for a crime that is a product of this generation.

With the recent shootings in Aurora, Colorado and the threatened shootings in other places, authorities are being more persistent in their pursuit of these types of cases than ever before. What Song did was absolutely wrong and he deserved to be punished for it, but the fact that a random posting on a social media site has led to a criminal investigation shows you just how seriously the police are starting to take this type of case. There is no wiggle room for a mass threat made against a large group of people like this. Song is paying the price for what could have been a joke on his part.

This case is also a good lesson about the dangers of this technology. In 2012 there is nowhere to hide. You can’t put something out into the ether and hope to remain anonymous. Even before the police gets involved, things like this will get traced back to you, and as this case shows, you could pay a pretty steep price as a result.

The post Former University of Maryland Honors Student Pleads Guilty After Threatening Shooting Rampage appeared first on .

Sex offenders who forget to register after moving or who ignore the registration mandate altogether face serious consequences if caught by police for any other crimes or is turned in by someone that they know.

Every state has their own variation of laws for sex offenders, for example the State of Arizona considers failure to register as a sex offender as a separate crime for which the offender can be prosecuted and imprisoned. The charge is a Class 4 felony that carries a maximum penalty of up to two and a half years in prison. The offender will be supervised upon release and has to register with the sheriff’s department. Once registered, the sheriff’s department categorizes offenders into one of three levels based on the risk that they pose to the community.

Third-level offenders are considered a danger to the public and more likely to commit a crime again. The sheriff’s office notifies neighborhoods, schools and other community groups about the sex offender by sending a flyer to them containing the offender’s photo, exact address, and criminal history.

The sheriff’s office also notifies the nearby community of second-level offenders. Notifications can also include flyers with the offender’s photo, criminal history, and the general area, and not the exact address, of his residence. With first-level offenders, the sheriff’s office provides information about the offender to other area law enforcement agencies and the people with whom the sex offender will live.

Guest Post provided by David Cantor, Sex Crimes Attorney in Phoenix, AZ. The Law Offices of David Michael Cantor is an AV rated law firm that handles all types of Arizona sex crimes.

The post Failure To Register As A Sex Offender appeared first on .

Police were able to apprehend who they believe to be the gunman in a parking lot behind the theatre shortly after the incident took place. According to police, he still had two guns on him, and he submitted to arrest without putting up any sort of a fight.

While in police custody the suspect made mention of an explosive device in his apartment building. Police quickly rushed over to the building and evacuated all of the tenants, as well as those living in surrounding buildings. There is no word yet on if they were able to find any explosive device, but the police did say that they found ìitems of interestî in and around the apartment.
Aurora police called all available officers to the theater, and with the FBI responding as well, there were hundreds of law enforcement officers there to help with the situation. As of Friday morning, police are still searching the suspectís apartment in an attempt to gain some background information and determine why he might have committed this horrible tragedy. They have not ruled out that he was acting as part of a terrorist plot, but the commonly held theory right now is that he was working alone.
The Dark Knight Rises was one of the most anticipated movies of the summer, and itís midnight showing was packed in theatres all across the Country. It is a particularly violent movie, and some parallels between the movie violence and the violence that ensued will presumably be drawn by analysts in the near future. Whether or not the actual movie had anything to do with the actions of the gunman remains to be seen.

According to witnesses that escaped the theatre, some of the patrons were slow to react to the attack because they believed that the smoke and gunfire were just special effects that were being used to enhance the experience and make the opening showing of the movie special. They quickly realized that it was not part of the show, and a stampede out of the theatre ensued. There is reportedly cell phone video taken by someone who was in the theatre that shows some audience members leaving the theatre with a significant amount of blood on their clothes. The video also shows what appears to be a pretty young child dressed up in a batman costume leaving the theatre at well.

The post 12 Dead, 38 Injured After Shooting At Midnight Release of The Dark Knight Rises appeared first on .